<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wordtracker vs. Google &#8211; You be the Judge.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nichefree.com/wordtracker-vs-google-you-be-the-judge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nichefree.com/wordtracker-vs-google-you-be-the-judge/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:43:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GL McClendon</title>
		<link>http://www.nichefree.com/wordtracker-vs-google-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-8758</link>
		<dc:creator>GL McClendon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nichefree.com/?p=22#comment-8758</guid>
		<description>Use the site that is most comfortable for you. Sometimes we kick another man&#039;s cow. 
You may be complaining, because you are not using the tool correctly. 
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use the site that is most comfortable for you. Sometimes we kick another man&#8217;s cow.<br />
You may be complaining, because you are not using the tool correctly.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cayo Largo</title>
		<link>http://www.nichefree.com/wordtracker-vs-google-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-8141</link>
		<dc:creator>Cayo Largo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nichefree.com/?p=22#comment-8141</guid>
		<description>That is true .. I think that using SEObook free tool is the best option as it is free plus you can from its page click and check google and others as well. Point is dont pay if you can get it for free. Build and promote and they will come!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true .. I think that using SEObook free tool is the best option as it is free plus you can from its page click and check google and others as well. Point is dont pay if you can get it for free. Build and promote and they will come!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrique Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.nichefree.com/wordtracker-vs-google-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-7957</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nichefree.com/?p=22#comment-7957</guid>
		<description>I was comparing Google&#039;s KW tool result with the free version of Wordtracker and the numbers are soooo different, Wow, and they charge $59 for the service...

Last year I subscribed for two months to WT. I got some nice keywords that brought me some traffic... but I also learned something that I&#039;m still using everyday: The KEI metric. I sorted the algorithm and got the formula... now i&#039;m using it with google&#039;s free tool!
Thanks WT :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was comparing Google&#8217;s KW tool result with the free version of Wordtracker and the numbers are soooo different, Wow, and they charge $59 for the service&#8230;</p>
<p>Last year I subscribed for two months to WT. I got some nice keywords that brought me some traffic&#8230; but I also learned something that I&#8217;m still using everyday: The KEI metric. I sorted the algorithm and got the formula&#8230; now i&#8217;m using it with google&#8217;s free tool!<br />
Thanks WT <img src='http://www.nichefree.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.nichefree.com/wordtracker-vs-google-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-4028</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nichefree.com/?p=22#comment-4028</guid>
		<description>I have used both and I would say google is the winner. Why? The have now google search insight. Based on actual searches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used both and I would say google is the winner. Why? The have now google search insight. Based on actual searches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.nichefree.com/wordtracker-vs-google-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-1728</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nichefree.com/?p=22#comment-1728</guid>
		<description>Ladies and gents, it comes down to the fact that the vast majority of searches are done on Granddaddy &#039;G&#039;. We can speculate all day as to what database is the most accurate, where and how they get their data from, but Google is used the most to search for info and answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladies and gents, it comes down to the fact that the vast majority of searches are done on Granddaddy &#8216;G&#8217;. We can speculate all day as to what database is the most accurate, where and how they get their data from, but Google is used the most to search for info and answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Cummings</title>
		<link>http://www.nichefree.com/wordtracker-vs-google-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nichefree.com/?p=22#comment-454</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article.  I just wrote an article entitled &quot;Is Wordtracker Accurate&quot;? this morning which can be found here:  http://richardcummings.info/is-wordtracker-accurate/

In my opinion, the bottom line is that Wordtracker is best for long tail keyword and google for shorter expressions.  I  will say that i have had some awesome long tail suggestions from Wordtracker and, like you say, other terms that are not even in the Wordtracker database.

I suppose that, In the end, there is just not one tool that can cover your keyword needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article.  I just wrote an article entitled &#8220;Is Wordtracker Accurate&#8221;? this morning which can be found here:  <a href="http://richardcummings.info/is-wordtracker-accurate/" rel="nofollow">http://richardcummings.info/is-wordtracker-accurate/</a></p>
<p>In my opinion, the bottom line is that Wordtracker is best for long tail keyword and google for shorter expressions.  I  will say that i have had some awesome long tail suggestions from Wordtracker and, like you say, other terms that are not even in the Wordtracker database.</p>
<p>I suppose that, In the end, there is just not one tool that can cover your keyword needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joerg Rauh</title>
		<link>http://www.nichefree.com/wordtracker-vs-google-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Joerg Rauh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 16:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nichefree.com/?p=22#comment-450</guid>
		<description>Thank you guys for bringing up this important issue.
Since we base what we are doing on numbers they better be accurate.
What I learned here was that you can rank number one in Google and have practically no visitors to your site.
I&#039;m always after ways to avoid problems I can&#039;t handle well. In this case I go email marketing. What counts are the people in my list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you guys for bringing up this important issue.<br />
Since we base what we are doing on numbers they better be accurate.<br />
What I learned here was that you can rank number one in Google and have practically no visitors to your site.<br />
I&#8217;m always after ways to avoid problems I can&#8217;t handle well. In this case I go email marketing. What counts are the people in my list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web world guru</title>
		<link>http://www.nichefree.com/wordtracker-vs-google-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>web world guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nichefree.com/?p=22#comment-443</guid>
		<description>google adwords: keyword tool wins
if you search &quot;keyword&quot; in google the first link is google adwords: keyword tool
Word tracker cannot stand in front of google database.

regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google adwords: keyword tool wins<br />
if you search &#8220;keyword&#8221; in google the first link is google adwords: keyword tool<br />
Word tracker cannot stand in front of google database.</p>
<p>regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.nichefree.com/wordtracker-vs-google-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Video Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nichefree.com/?p=22#comment-413</guid>
		<description>You have to use the &quot;exact&quot; search results in google. Also look at the little ? above avg search volume. Google takes the average search volume over 12 months and displays that &quot;average&quot;. That&#039;s why the 2 columns, the avg and the previous month, can be so different. 

I have a paid subscription to WT and I&#039;m wondering what&#039;s up. I mean how can we trust the data when we use google to search but WT doesn&#039;t report any figures for Google. Doesn&#039;t make sense. 

I use google to search for a keyword. When you do a normal search the results are the &quot;broad&quot; results. If you then enclose the that same term within &quot;quotes&quot; you&#039;ll get the &quot;exact&quot; results. But everyone only uses the &quot;broad&quot; search because who really searches with quotes when looking for something, no one.

The best thing is to do a search and check the top organic listings. They are there for a reason. Study their site and search a few phrases. you&#039;ll start to see a few websites stand out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to use the &#8220;exact&#8221; search results in google. Also look at the little ? above avg search volume. Google takes the average search volume over 12 months and displays that &#8220;average&#8221;. That&#8217;s why the 2 columns, the avg and the previous month, can be so different. </p>
<p>I have a paid subscription to WT and I&#8217;m wondering what&#8217;s up. I mean how can we trust the data when we use google to search but WT doesn&#8217;t report any figures for Google. Doesn&#8217;t make sense. </p>
<p>I use google to search for a keyword. When you do a normal search the results are the &#8220;broad&#8221; results. If you then enclose the that same term within &#8220;quotes&#8221; you&#8217;ll get the &#8220;exact&#8221; results. But everyone only uses the &#8220;broad&#8221; search because who really searches with quotes when looking for something, no one.</p>
<p>The best thing is to do a search and check the top organic listings. They are there for a reason. Study their site and search a few phrases. you&#8217;ll start to see a few websites stand out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Make Money on eBay</title>
		<link>http://www.nichefree.com/wordtracker-vs-google-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Make Money on eBay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 03:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nichefree.com/?p=22#comment-401</guid>
		<description>The way I work is to - 
Double-cross-check the results from Google external tool with Worldtrucker. 
I use wordtracker only as a referance to verify that a certain key phrase do &quot;exist&quot; in worldtracker results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I work is to &#8211;<br />
Double-cross-check the results from Google external tool with Worldtrucker.<br />
I use wordtracker only as a referance to verify that a certain key phrase do &#8220;exist&#8221; in worldtracker results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
